Friday, May 10, 2013

Nebula Signalism



Nebula Signalism



"We are now entering the Mutara Nebula"
Spock, The Wrath of Khan


Realms of life and death

Battle in the Mutara Nebula between Captain Kirk, a man who cheated death, and Khan, genetically engineered genius, who also yearned for eternal living, is a masterpiece of a generation sprung around the idea of Gene Roddenberry's - "Star Trek."
Anyone who has tried to reach the truth with his thoughts, ended up in the nebula, far away from the contours of the distinctive . Therefore, those believing in reason steal time and space from the opaque, incomprehensible and thus frightening. The result is a feeling of vulnerability=security, as well as the stress of life preservation. That is built into the nervous system of living beings, as a reactive, reflex mechanism.
Feelings are states of life and are opposed to the uncertain and the unnamed which they interpret as - the state of death, an area where there is no chain of causation. In other words, the area beyond the boundaries of being, is seen as preceding the Big Bang, the beginning of life and distancing from the death (the incomprehensible, indiscernible) in which, paradoxically, rules the principle of equally distributed energy (entropy).
The realm of the nebula/death marks life as different from itself, and from which one should move away, not pursue it.
Thus works two-dimensional, two-way mind.
Fear, the true face of such a mind, sees things upside down: in the natural science the state of entropy, heat death, is seen as the ultimate outcome of the collapse of the so-called isolated system. Thus, death is both before and after Genesis. This is how a straight line turns into a circle.
A step into the three-dimensional thinking gives us a picture of the bubble, which is completely surrounded by vacuum, but, fortunately - outer space stretches on its own, and, so it seems, there is no danger that this baffling force of death will eventually destroy life. On the contrary, three-dimensional mind feels safe in its stretchy aporia. And nonchalantly.
Space-time continuum, that is about the limit of the civilized mind. Cozy womb (matrix) within which a standard duration of life is established, along with the probability that mediocrity will continue stretching in accordance with the basic idea of expanding into itself.
Thus works the three-dimensional mind. The mediocre mind.
Here we talk about the paradox of life, because life is the one that remains unexplained. If the explanation happened, life would lose its main feature - isolation [1] from knowledge. Survival of life depends on the inability to understand, that is, on the ability to project imaginary outcomes as and instead of the truth. Life is formal versus informal. It manifests itself as a tendency, and as such falls short of cognition.
With this problem equally deal both philosophy and art.
Both activities, at the crossroads of life and death, have experienced duplication, philosophy has split into the mystical and the rational/sensual and art into the abstract (informal) and realistic (formal).
In attempting to explain or falsely explain the world, there have been various historical events and trends. One has moved towards death and the other towards life.
In mystical philosophy defining death is the culmination of cognition - from this viewpoint, life is seen as the suffering. In art, the freed energy, which has been scientifically identified as entropy, and in the theory of art more precisely, as expressionism, produces a vibrant world of challenges, as an explosion that can be contained and kept inside the one moment and one point.
In philosophy (Zen, Taoism, Apeironism,) too, existential knowledge is a collapse into a single point, which is both pre- and identical to the Big Bang.
In both cases, cognition is clearly discerned from reason and is not the result of logical simulation of cognition. On the contrary, the basic method which leads to cognition is analytical - discerning, devastating.


Artistic and philosophical vanguard

It should be clearly said that the vanguard does not belong to the idea of art, as in social superstructure of civilization. Art was like philosophy, in historical times, stolen from mysticism, where its origin and home are. Then there was the false effort to reasonably determine it (so that the bubble can include the vacuum around), aesthetic theories sprang up, attempts to fit it into religious and political ideologies, and finally art has been thrown at the market - the free market, together with other civilizations' garbage, completely devalued - stripped of the mystical, that actually never in history could have any real value.
Vanguard investigates the unknown. While doing so it also penetrates inside the Unknowable and communicates its findings to the main horde. Which, in turn, is not interested at all in the Unknowable. The horde is only interested in what is there to eat, of which one - lives.
The horde does not need the vanguard and it forgoes it by all means. The Great Khan needs explorers/crooks of the Walter Raleigh kind, who will announce that somewhere, in a strange world which needs to be colonized, there are mountains and rivers full of gold (Eldorado). The horde needs such knowledge that will move stupid masses to the wanted direction. A specific image is needed and not the story of the Formless. [2)
The need for change, to loosen the bonds, is the condition for the creation of the vanguard. But often, the effort involved gets reduced to polemic debate with members of the established, traditional culture, while the areas awaiting for the light to be shed on them are ignored. What connects people is the idea that communication depends on the medium - on conversing, and on the insistence that everything must happen through mediation of society. Because of that, there are many attempts to behave vanguard-wise, but they often end up in the form of graffiti on the walls that are not jumped over.


Signalism - vanguard of exclusiveness

The founder of the vanguard movement of Signalism, Miroljub Todorovic, was not inhibited by the mentioned need to do his own thing in concert with the existing "flows", which could rather be called stale ponds than clear streams.
Even his first attempts to introduce, at that time, an inappropriate content into the present poetic context, which he then called Scientism, caused an automatic and mindless response from the on-duty supervisors of cultural events. With their shallow, quasi-philosophical and quasi-theoretician views, they dug for themselves a deep grave.
Luckily, and that's what ignorant cowards do not know, when a person puts pressure on the Unknowable, new spaces are open in which existence is not under duress. What prevents the formation of a series of conditioning is a method of deconstruction, as a filter through which is passed the experienced reality. This purifies it and releases it from the power of pursuit, caused by the introduction of memory and projecting, as a means to establish the false persistence.
Signalism of Miroljub Todorovic is characterized by an effort to deconstruct one-sided perception of life esthetics (Planet), for him a cosmic consciousness is a pincer maneuver of momentary passing through matter and its whirls, where the charge used for the analysis of processes is stored in the form of absolute speed - which is the poetic energy that is not consumed in worshiping of the form.On the contrary, the duration of form is realized in the focus of force, and forms remain with it and do not deteriorate as is the case in nature. Thus the living remains in the very act of creation.
One must have enough experience, force, to return the world he loves back into possession, while by doing so it is inevitably changed and translated into the forceful form of existence.
This difference in intelligence of Signalist poets and those who borrow their mind from (traditional) patterns - is insurmountable. It represents the difference between life and death. Intelligence is what is lacking in life. Life is afraid of and renounces intelligence.
Signalism did not simply reject tradition. It critically sifted it and kept what was valuable, adding new members to the content of reality, but it rejected the uncritical method of imitating old masters. The Master is not a historical category, once and for all given as a role model. One can still be an authentic sage at present day.
What allowed the existence of Signalism and its ever greater and more powerful proliferation, after more than forty years, is the clarity of expression and the method used by the poet. Signalism does not tolerate and will not allow repetition. Todorovic and others, create cycle after cycle, but they differ from each other - by content, perceiving position, tempo and resonance, in continuous detection and alignment of new poetic expressions.


Intelligence or Indulgence?

It is much easier to pay a priest and get forgiveness, than to be smart and resolve the problem of "sinful" nature on your own.
In the film, The Wrath of Khan, mentioned at the beginning of this short essay, the base of drama is a clash between two worlds, which only seem to resemble each other, but differ substantially. Khan is the undisputed, all-knowing leader, of proven and documented intelligence. But his intelligence operates only within the well-known and predictable. Therefore, it is unjustly called by that name. Intelligence can not be proven by relationship to the known - that is but submission to the enslaving relationship towards the basic idea of a perfect, isolated system.
In the Mutara Nebula there are no protocols. Captain Kirk is free to create rules that will turn his apparent weaknesses into advantage. It only takes a moment of focusing, summarizing into the point, to overcome the seemingly invincible opponent.
Analytical method of cognition and creation, also called stochastic [3] - means that there are enough empirical elements to be able to improvise. [4] Ironically, the method that relies on the unpredictability of the outcome gives excellent results in the field of creativity. Experience plus the lack of representation of possible outcomes (predictions) results in a strong and active creation which, though novel, has, as a system, all the pieces necessary for spiritual existence in eternity, as opposed to the notion of perpetual renewal and rejuvenation in an area where all is doomed - the realm of life. Which is, as was already said, the mind of a straight line.
Terminological confusion is obvious. The expression life can be used in both cases. Also, death can mean both a good and a bad outcome. The reason for this is the biased and stubborn refusal to investigate death as an opportunity and basis for a higher quality existence, this because one-, two- and three-dimensional mind is being used. For proper understanding and overcoming the usual interpretation an unlimited mind is required.


Another word or two on the System

One of the "mighty" ideas, which are the most confusing, is the idea of the system. The primitive mind imagines an overall system, as for example the one on which Plato wrote of as "the highest good", namely - the state. But not only the state, also "Eco-system", Gaia, social system, "isolated" system, or like in Hegel, "The Spirit as History," and so on.
Primitive mind, following Aristotle's principle of categories, wishes to monitor the world as a system of stored parts (thus automatically regulated parts), while hoping for their lawful interrelation. As if in nature there were a law or laws by which all things conduct. This "law" is the very nature of the organized seeing, therefore it is - in perception and not in the nature of the seen. This is because the basic property of an idea, projection, is - self-justification. It sees itself as - the law.
Science introduces the chance into the game, throwing the emphasis on the probability that there is legitimacy. That is The Game Theory. Here is stochastic differently understood from the above mentioned, because the probability is still insisting on projecting as an event, and the matter is not brought to the point where time is not a factor (but there is a conditioned sequence of events). Science is not prepared to face the uncertain.
The present is always uncertain, because it does not see the future. And it does not see it because there isn't one. Hegel monitored the past and saw legitimacy in it, and then drew the conclusion that all is well. Because there is a "legitimacy". And that is self-justification.
I will get now to the point. Stochastic or Signalist relation to the system is that the system is something emerging and only currently exists as "final". System will not "be finished" someday. The system is as we see it at this moment - and as such we use it. The poet creates a cycle of poems, or a novel, using the stochastic method, not knowing in advance which actual words, and in what interrelation, he will use. All is uncertain to the very end. Nonetheless, the method that feeds exclusively on the intent not to predict [5] , creates a new world that is momentarily seen with all the necessary "laws", which actually make it a world. This proves that the world does not become from a previous world, following the laws of conditioning. Therefore, there is no movement of the Spirit as History. There is no "progress" throughout history. Properly understood evolution, without an ideological superstructure, is just that. There is no "time-line".
Signalist world-system is a dynamic space. The force that makes it is knowledge. The world is as much as we know about it. The way we comprehend is the key moment of creation. If we "comprehend" in accordance with the previous "knowledge" we will never experience The Creation of the World, because the world has already been created, and being so we have been denied the pleasure to create ourselves. Thank you very much! Created world needs janitors and guards, victims and martyrs.
The Game Theory is different from the art of playing. The artist plays with knowledge as with a force that creates. In this gamble, the artist will always win talon. Professional gamblers, who actually never play of chance, will lose anyway. Because they are unable to predict or control creation. Created outcome belongs entirely to the creative method. And causal method can only deal with the - created.



[1] Lat .. insula - island.
[2] The campaign for colonization of Mars has already began, and it will surely follow the notorious Dutch scheme of settlement of the New Worlds (religious persecution and the like, produce a bunch of refugees easy to displace and even be charged for the transport, which is the basis of historical economics).
[3] The stochastic or aleatory - literally gamblers'.
[4] The coined word improvisatio literally means foresight.
[5] Doing nothing - not-doing.

Slobodan Škerović

Nebula Signalism



"We are now entering the Mutara Nebula"
Spock, The Wrath of Khan


Realms of life and death

Battle in the Mutara Nebula between Captain Kirk, a man who cheated death, and Khan, genetically engineered genius, who also yearned for eternal living, is a masterpiece of a generation sprung around the idea of Gene Roddenberry's - "Star Trek."
Anyone who has tried to reach the truth with his thoughts, ended up in the nebula, far away from the contours of the distinctive . Therefore, those believing in reason steal time and space from the opaque, incomprehensible and thus frightening. The result is a feeling of vulnerability=security, as well as the stress of life preservation. That is built into the nervous system of living beings, as a reactive, reflex mechanism.
Feelings are states of life and are opposed to the uncertain and the unnamed which they interpret as - the state of death, an area where there is no chain of causation. In other words, the area beyond the boundaries of being, is seen as preceding the Big Bang, the beginning of life and distancing from the death (the incomprehensible, indiscernible) in which, paradoxically, rules the principle of equally distributed energy (entropy).
The realm of the nebula/death marks life as different from itself, and from which one should move away, not pursue it.
Thus works two-dimensional, two-way mind.
Fear, the true face of such a mind, sees things upside down: in the natural science the state of entropy, heat death, is seen as the ultimate outcome of the collapse of the so-called isolated system. Thus, death is both before and after Genesis. This is how a straight line turns into a circle.
A step into the three-dimensional thinking gives us a picture of the bubble, which is completely surrounded by vacuum, but, fortunately - outer space stretches on its own, and, so it seems, there is no danger that this baffling force of death will eventually destroy life. On the contrary, three-dimensional mind feels safe in its stretchy aporia. And nonchalantly.
Space-time continuum, that is about the limit of the civilized mind. Cozy womb (matrix) within which a standard duration of life is established, along with the probability that mediocrity will continue stretching in accordance with the basic idea of expanding into itself.
Thus works the three-dimensional mind. The mediocre mind.
Here we talk about the paradox of life, because life is the one that remains unexplained. If the explanation happened, life would lose its main feature - isolation [1] of knowledge. Survival of life depends on the inability to understand, that is, on the ability to project imaginary outcomes as and instead of the truth. Life is formal versus informal. It manifests itself as a tendency, and as such falls short of cognition.
With this problem equally deal both philosophy and art.
Both activities, at the crossroads of life and death, have experienced duplication, philosophy has split into the mystical and the rational/sensual and art into the abstract (informal) and realistic (formal).
In attempting to explain or falsely explain the world, there have been various historical events and trends. One has moved towards death and the other towards life.
In mystical philosophy defining death is the culmination of cognition - from this viewpoint, life is seen as the suffering. In art, the freed energy, which has been scientifically identified as entropy, and in the theory of art more precisely, as expressionism, produces a vibrant world of challenges, as an explosion that can be contained and kept inside the one moment and one point.
In philosophy (Zen, Taoism, Apeironism,) too, existential knowledge is a collapse into a single point, which is both pre- and identical to the Big Bang.
In both cases, cognition is clearly discerned from reason and is not the result of logical simulation of cognition. On the contrary, the basic method which leads to cognition is analytical - discerning, devastating.


Artistic and philosophical vanguard

It should be clearly said that the vanguard does not belong to the idea of art, as in social superstructure of civilization. Art was like philosophy, in historical times, stolen from mysticism, where its origin and home are. Then there was the false effort to reasonably determine it (so that the bubble can include the vacuum around), aesthetic theories sprang up, attempts to fit it into religious and political ideologies, and finally art has been thrown at the market - the free market, together with other civilizations' garbage, completely devalued - stripped of the mystical, that actually never in history could have any real value.
Vanguard investigates the unknown. While doing so it also penetrates inside the Unknowable and communicates its findings to the main horde. Which, in turn, is not interested at all in the Unknowable. The horde is only interested in what is there to eat, of which one - lives.
The horde does not need the vanguard and it forgoes it by all means. The Great Khan needs explorers/crooks of the Walter Raleigh kind, who will announce that somewhere, in a strange world which needs to be colonized, there are mountains and rivers full of gold (Eldorado). The horde needs such knowledge that will move stupid masses to the wanted direction. A specific image is needed and not the story of the Formless. [2)
The need for change, to loosen the bonds, is the condition for the creation of the vanguard. But often, the effort involved gets reduced to polemic debate with members of the established, traditional culture, while the areas awaiting for the light to be shed on them are ignored. What connects people is the idea that communication depends on the medium - on conversing, and on the insistence that everything must happen through mediation of society. Because of that, there are many attempts to behave vanguard-wise, but they often end up in the form of graffiti on the walls that are not jumped over.


Signalism - vanguard of exclusiveness

The founder of the vanguard movement of Signalism, Miroljub Todorovic, was not inhibited by the mentioned need to do his own thing in concert with the existing "flows", which could rather be called stale ponds than clear streams.
Even his first attempts to introduce, at that time, an inappropriate content into the present poetic context, which he then called Scientism, caused an automatic and mindless response from the on-duty supervisors of cultural events. With their shallow, quasi-philosophical and quasi-theoretician views, they dug for themselves a deep grave.
Luckily, and that's what ignorant cowards do not know, when a person puts pressure on the Unknowable, new spaces are open in which existence is not under duress. What prevents the formation of a series of conditioning is a method of deconstruction, as a filter through which is passed the experienced reality. This purifies it and releases it from the power of pursuit, caused by the introduction of memory and projecting, as a means to establish the false persistence.
Signalism of Miroljub Todorovic is characterized by an effort to deconstruct one-sided perception of life esthetics (Planet), for him a cosmic consciousness is a pincer maneuver of momentary passing through matter and its whirls, where the charge used for the analysis of processes is stored in the form of absolute speed - which is the poetic energy that is not consumed in worshiping of the form.On the contrary, the duration of form is realized in the focus of force, and forms remain with it and do not deteriorate as is the case in nature. Thus the living remains in the very act of creation.
One must have enough experience, force, to return the world he loves back into possession, while by doing so it is inevitably changed and translated into the forceful form of existence.
This difference in intelligence of Signalist poets and those who borrow their mind from (traditional) patterns - is insurmountable. It represents the difference between life and death. Intelligence is what is lacking in life. Life is afraid of and renounces intelligence.
Signalism did not simply reject tradition. It critically sifted it and kept what was valuable, adding new members to the content of reality, but it rejected the uncritical method of imitating old masters. The Master is not a historical category, once and for all given as a role model. One can still be an authentic sage at present day.
What allowed the existence of Signalism and its ever greater and more powerful proliferation, after more than forty years, is the clarity of expression and the method used by the poet. Signalism does not tolerate and will not allow repetition. Todorovic and others, create cycle after cycle, but they differ from each other - by content, perceiving position, tempo and resonance, in continuous detection and alignment of new poetic expressions.


Intelligence or Indulgence?

It is much easier to pay a priest and get forgiveness, than to be smart and resolve the problem of "sinful" nature on your own.
In the film, The Wrath of Khan, mentioned at the beginning of this short essay, the base of drama is a clash between two worlds, which only seem to resemble each other, but differ substantially. Khan is the undisputed, all-knowing leader, of proven and documented intelligence. But his intelligence operates only within the well-known and predictable. Therefore, it is unjustly called by that name. Intelligence can not be proven by relationship to the known - that is but submission to the enslaving relationship towards the basic idea of a perfect, isolated system.
In the Mutara Nebula there are no protocols. Captain Kirk is free to create rules that will turn his apparent weaknesses into advantage. It only takes a moment of focusing, summarizing into the point, to overcome the seemingly invincible opponent.
Analytical method of cognition and creation, also called stochastic [3] - means that there are enough empirical elements to be able to improvise. [4] Ironically, the method that relies on the unpredictability of the outcome gives excellent results in the field of creativity. Experience plus the lack of representation of possible outcomes (predictions) results in a strong and active creation which, though novel, has, as a system, all the pieces necessary for spiritual existence in eternity, as opposed to the notion of perpetual renewal and rejuvenation in an area where all is doomed - the realm of life. Which is, as was already said, the mind of a straight line.
Terminological confusion is obvious. The expression life can be used in both cases. Also, death can mean both a good and a bad outcome. The reason for this is the biased and stubborn refusal to investigate death as an opportunity and basis for a higher quality existence, this because one-, two- and three-dimensional mind is being used. For proper understanding and overcoming the usual interpretation an unlimited mind is required.


Another word or two on the System

One of the "mighty" ideas, which are the most confusing, is the idea of the system. The primitive mind imagines an overall system, as for example the one on which Plato wrote of as "the highest good", namely - the state. But not only the state, also "Eco-system", Gaia, social system, "isolated" system, or like in Hegel, "The Spirit as History," and so on.
Primitive mind, following Aristotle's principle of categories, wishes to monitor the world as a system of stored parts (thus automatically regulated parts), while hoping for their lawful interrelation. As if in nature there were a law or laws by which all things conduct. This "law" is the very nature of the organized seeing, therefore it is - in perception and not in the nature of the seen. This is because the basic property of an idea, projection, is - self-justification. It sees itself as - the law.
Science introduces the chance into the game, throwing the emphasis on the probability that there is legitimacy. That is The Game Theory. Here is stochastic differently understood from the above mentioned, because the probability is still insisting on projecting as an event, and the matter is not brought to the point where time is not a factor (but there is a conditioned sequence of events). Science is not prepared to face the uncertain.
The present is always uncertain, because it does not see the future. And it does not see it because there isn't one. Hegel monitored the past and saw legitimacy in it, and then drew the conclusion that all is well. Because there is a "legitimacy". And that is self-justification.
I will get now to the point. Stochastic or Signalist relation to the system is that the system is something emerging and only currently exists as "final". System will not "be finished" someday. The system is as we see it at this moment - and as such we use it. The poet creates a cycle of poems, or a novel, using the stochastic method, not knowing in advance which actual words, and in what interrelation, he will use. All is uncertain to the very end. Nonetheless, the method that feeds exclusively on the intent not to predict [5] , creates a new world that is momentarily seen with all the necessary "laws", which actually make it a world. This proves that the world does not become from a previous world, following the laws of conditioning. Therefore, there is no movement of the Spirit as History. There is no "progress" throughout history. Properly understood evolution, without an ideological superstructure, is just that. There is no "time-line".
Signalist world-system is a dynamic space. The force that makes it is knowledge. The world is as much as we know about it. The way we comprehend is the key moment of creation. If we "comprehend" in accordance with the previous "knowledge" we will never experience The Creation of the World, because the world has already been created, and being so we have been denied the pleasure to create ourselves. Thank you very much! Created world needs janitors and guards, victims and martyrs.
The Game Theory is different from the art of playing. The artist plays with knowledge as with a force that creates. In this gamble, the artist will always win talon. Professional gamblers, who actually never play of chance, will lose anyway. Because they are unable to predict or control creation. Created outcome belongs entirely to the creative method. And causal method can only deal with the - created.



[1] Lat .. insula - island.
[2] The campaign for colonization of Mars has already began, and it will surely follow the notorious Dutch scheme of settlement of the New Worlds (religious persecution and the like, produce a bunch of refugees easy to displace and even be charged for the transport, which is the basis of historical economics).
[3] The stochastic or aleatory - literally gamblers'.
[4] The coined word improvisatio literally means foresight.
[5] Doing nothing - not-doing.




Thursday, May 9, 2013

Маглина Сигнализам





Маглина Сигнализам



Сада улазимо у Мутара маглину“
Спок, Канов гнев


Области живота и смрти

Битка у Мутара маглини између капетана Кирка, човека који је варао смрт, и Кана, генетски модификованог генија, који је такође жудео за вечним живљењем, представља ремек дело генерације поникле око идеје Џина Роденберија – „Звездане Стазе“.
Свако ко је покушао да мислима досегне до истине, завршио је у маглини, далеко од обриса препознатљивог. Стога, верујући разума краду простор и време од непрозирног, несазнатљивог и самим тим застрашујућег. Последица тога је осећање угрожености=безбедности, и стрес одржања живота. То је уграђено у нервни систем живих бића, као реактивни, рефлексни механизам.
Осећања су животна стања и супротстављена су неизвесном и неименованом које тумаче као – стање смрти, област у којој не постоји низ условљености. Другим речима, та област иза границе бивања, доживљава се као претходећа Великом праску, почетку живота и удаљавања од смрти (несазнатљивог, неразлучивог) у којој, парадоксално, влада начело равноправно расподељене енергије (ентропија).
Област маглине/смрти, живот означава као од себе различиту, од које се треба удаљавати, а не тежити.
Тако ради дводимензионални, двосмерни ум.
Страх, право лице оваквог ума, види ствари наопако: у природној науци стање ентропије, топлотне смрти, види се као крајњи исход пропасти такозваног изолованог система. Значи, смрт је и пре и после Постања. Овако се права линија претвара у кружницу.
Искорак у тродимензионално размишљање даје нам слику мехура, који је са свих страна окружен вакуумом, али, на сву срећу – свемирски простор се сам од себе растеже, па, изгледа, не постоји опасност да ће та непојамна сила смрти коначно уништити живот. Напротив, тродимензионални ум се осећа безбедно у својој растегљивој апорији. И нехајно.
Просторно временски континуум, то је отприлике граница цивилизованог ума. Угодна материца у којој је успостављено стандардно трајање живота, с вероватноћом да ће се просечност растезати у складу с основном идејом ширења у себе.
Тако ради тродимензионални ум. Медиокритетски ум.
Овде је реч о парадоксу живота, јер је управо он тај који остаје необјашњен. Уколико би се десило објашњење, живот би изгубио своју основну особину – изолованост1 од спознаје. Опстанак живота овиси од неспособности да се разуме, односно од способности представљања замишљених исхода као и уместо истине. Живот је формално насупрот неформалном. Испољава се као тежња, и као такав не досеже до спознаје.
Овим проблемом баве се, равноправно, филозофија и уметност.
Обе делатности, на размеђи живота и смрти, доживеле су подвајање, филозофија се подвојила на мистичку и разумску/чулну, а уметност на апстрактну (енформел) и реалистичку (формалну).
У покушајима да се свет објасни или лажно објасни, догодиле су се различите историјске појаве и токови. Једни су тежили смрти а други животу.
У мистичкој филозофији одређење смрти је врхунац спознаје – са оваквог става живот се сагледава као патња. У уметности, ослобођена енергија, која је научно означена као ентропија, а у теорији уметности нешто прецизније, као експресионизам, производи живахни свет изазова, као експлозију која се може обухватити и задржати у једном тренутку и једној тачки.
У филозофији (зен, таоизам, апејронизам), такође, егзистенцијална спознаја јесте сажимање у једну тачку, која је и пре- и истоветна Великом праску.
У оба случаја, спознаја је јасно разлучена од разума и није последица логичке симулације спознаје. Напротив, основни метод који води спознаји јесте аналитички – разлучујући, разарајући.


Уметничка и филозофска авангарда

Треба јасно рећи да авангарда не припада идеји уметности, као друштвеној, цивилизацијској надградњи. Уметност је као и филозофија, у историјско доба, украдена од мистицизма, где јој је порекло и дом. Затим је дошло до претворног настојања да се разумно одреди (да мехур обухвати вакуум около), ницале су теорије естетике, покушаји религиозне и политичке идеологизације, и на крају је уметност бачена на тржиште – на слободно тржиште заједно с осталим цивилизацијским ђубретом, потпуно обезвређена – лишена оног мистичког, које заправо никада у историји и није могло имати цену.
Претходница истражује непознато. Она при томе залази и у неспознајно и саопштава своје налазе главној ордији. Ову, пак, неспознајно не занима. Ордију занима оно што је за јело, од чега се – живи.
Ордији оваква претходница не треба и она је се у свакој прилици одриче. Великом Кану требају истраживачи-преваранти типа Волтера Ралија, који ће објавити да тамо негде, у непознатом свету, који треба колонизовати, постоје планине и реке препуне злата (Елдорадо). Ордији треба таква спознаја која ће покренуту глупе масе у жељеном правцу. Потребна је конкретна представа а не прича о безобличном.2
Потреба за променом, ослобађањем од стега, услов је настанка авангарде. Међутим, често се тај напор своди на свађалачку расправу с припадницима етаблиране, традиционалне културе, при чему се леђа окрећу просторима који чекају да буду осветљени. Оно што људе везује јесте идеја да комуникација овиси о медијуму – разговору, захтеву да се све одвија посредовањем друштва. Због тога има много покушаја да се понаша авангардно, али они најчешће завршавају у облику графита на зидовима који нису прескочени.


Сигнализам – авангарда искључивости

Оснивач авангардног покрета сигнализма, Мирољуб Тодоровић, није био спутан поменутом потребом да своју ствар ради у договору с постојећим „токовима“, који се пре могу назвати устајалим млакама него бистрим потоцима.
Већ су његови први покушаји да у постојећи поетски контекст уведе до тада непримерене садржаје, а што је он назвао сцијентизам, изазвали аутоматску и бесловесну реакцију дежурних надзорника културних дешавања. Они су својим плитким, квазифилозофским и квазитеоретичарским назорима сами себи ископали дубок гроб.
На сву срећу, а то је оно што незналице и кукавице не знају, када човек врши притисак на неспознатљиво, отварају се нови простори у којима постојање није под принудом. Оно што спречава стварање низа условљености јесте метод деконструкције, као филтер кроз који се пропушта доживљена стварност. Тиме се она прочишћава и ослобађа силе тежње, узроковане памћењем и представљањем као начином да се успостави лажно истрајавање.
За сигнализам Мирољуба Тодоровића, карактеристичан је напор да се деконструише једнострана перцепција естетике живота (Планета), за њега је космичка свест обухватни маневар муњевитог пролажења кроз материју и њене ковитлаце, при чему се набој употребљен за сагледавање процеса чува у облику апсолутне брзине – а што је поетска енергија која се не троши у обожавању облика. Напротив, трајање облика остварује се у жижи силе, и облици остају с њом, а не пропадају као што је случај у природи. Тако је оно живо код њега сам чин стварања.
Потребно је имати довољно искуства, силе, да би се свет који нам је драг вратио у посед, али он при том неминовно бива измењен и преведен у силни облик постојања.
Ова разлика у интелигенцији песника сигнализма и оних који своју памет позајмљују од (традиционалних) образаца – непремостива је. Она представља разлику између живота и смрти. Интелигенција је оно што недостаје животу. Живот се плаши и одриче интелигенције.
Сигнализам није просто одбацио традицију. Он ју је критички просејао и задржао оно вредно, додајући том садржају нове чланове стварности, али је и одбацио некритички метод имитације старих мајстора. Мајстор није историјска категорија, једном заувек дата као узор. Може се и данас бити аутентични мудрац.
Оно што је сигнализму омогућило постојање и све силније бујање, након више од четрдесет година, јесте јасноћа израза и метода које песник користи. Сигнализам не трпи и не дозвољава понављање. Тодоровић и други, стварају циклус за циклусом, али они се међусобно разликују – по садржају, позицији сагледавања, темпу и резонанци, непрестаном откривању и усаглашавању нових поетских израза.


Интелигенција или индулгенција?

Много је лакше платити попу и добити опрост, него бити паметан и сам разрешити проблем „грешне“ природе.
У филму Канов гнев, наведеном на почетку овог кратког есеја, основ радње је сукоб два света, који наизглед личе један на други, али се суштински разликују. Кан је неприкосновени, свезнајући вођа, доказане и документоване интелигенције. Али, његова интелигенција делује једино у области познатог и предвидљивог. Самим тим, она се бесправно назива тим именом. Интелигенција се не доказује у одношењу према познатом – то је тек повиновање ропском односу према основној идеји савршеног, изолованог система.
У маглини Мутара не важе протоколи. Капетан Кирк је слободан да створи правила која ће његове очигледне слабости претворити у предност. Довољан је само један тренутак усређења, сажимања у тачку, да се савлада наизглед непобедиви противник.
Аналитички метод спознаје и стварања, назива се још и стохастички3 – подразумева се да постоји довољно искуствених елемената да би се могло импровизовати.4 Парадоксално, метод који се ослања на непредвидљивост исхода даје изванредне резултате у области стваралаштва. Искуство плус одсуство представљања могућих исхода (предвиђања) за последицу има чврсту и делатну творевину која, иако нова, поседује као склоп све делове неопходне за одуховљени опстанак у вечности, за разлику од представа вечитог обнављања и подмлађивања у области где је све осуђено на пропаст – области живота. Што је, рекосмо, ум праве линије.
Очигледна је терминолошка збрка. Може се израз живот употребити и у једном и другом случају. Такође, смрт може значити и добар и лош исход. Разлог овога јесте искључивост и тврдоглаво одбијање да се испита смрт, као могућност и основ квалитетнијег постојања, јер се за то користи једно-, дво- и тродимензионални ум. За правилно схватање и превазилажење устаљених тумачења неопходан је неограничени ум.


Још реч-две о Систему

Једна од „моћних“ идеја, које највише збуњују, јесте идеја о систему. Примитивни ум замишља свеобухватни систем, као рецимо онај о којем је Платон писао као о „највишем добру“, конкретно – држава. Али, не само држава, него и „еко систем“, Гаја, друштвени систем, „изоловани“ систем, или по Хегелу „Дух као историја“, итд.
Примитивни ум, следећи Аристотелов принцип категорија, жели да надгледа свет као систем ускладиштених делова (тиме се делови аутоматски уређују), при чему прижељкује њихово законито међуодношење. Као да у природи постоји закон или закони по којима се све управља. Овај „закон“ је сама природа организованог виђења, дакле – у сагледавању а не у природи сагледаваног. Ово због тога јер је основно својство идеје, представе – самооправдање. Она себе види као – закон.
Наука уводи случај у игру, бацајући нагласак на вероватноћу да ипак постоји законитост. То је Теорија игара. Овде је стохастичко различито схваћено од горе наведеног, јер вероватноћа и даље настоји на пројекцији као на догађају, те ствар није доведена у тачку где време више није чинилац (него постоји условљени низ догађаја). Наука је неспремна на суочавање с неизвесним.
Садашњост је увек неизвесна, јер не види будућност. А не види је јер је нема. Хегел је сагледавао прошлост и у њој видео законитост, па је извео закључак да је све како треба. Јер постоји „законитост“. А то је самооправдање.
Прећи ћу сада на ствар. Стохастички или сигналистички однос према систему јесте да је систем нешто у настајању и само тренутно постоји као „коначни“. Систем се неће „оконачити“ једнога дана. Систем је у тренутку оно каквим га видимо – тако га и користимо. Песник ствара циклус песама, или роман, користећи стохастички метод, при чему не зна које ће конкретне речи, и у каквим међуодносима, употребити. Све је до краја неизвесно. Упркос томе, метод који се храни искључиво намером да се не предвиђа5, ствара нови свет који се тренутно сагледава са свим потребним „законитостима“ које га и чине светом. Овим се доказује да свет не произлази из неког претходног света, по законима условљавања. Дакле, нема кретања Духа као Историје. Нема „напредовања“ кроз историју. Правилно схваћена еволуција, без идеолошке надградње, је управо то. Нема ту никакве „временске линије“.
Сигналистички систем-свет је динамички свемир. Сила која га твори је знање. Свет је онолико колико знамо о њему. На који начин сазнајемо јесте кључни моменат стварања. Уколико „сазнајемо“ у складу с претходним „знањима“ никада нећемо доживети Стварање света, јер је свет већ одавно створен, чиме смо лишени задовољства да и сами стварамо. Хвала вам лепо! Створеном свету неопходни су домари и чувари, жртве и страдалници.
Теорија игара се разликује од уметничког играња. Уметник се игра знањем као силом која ствара. У оваквој коцкарској игри, уметник ће увек освојити талон. Професионални коцкари, који ионако никад не играју на срећу, извисиће свеједно. Јер нису у стању да предвиде или надзиру стварање. Створени исход у потпуности припада стваралачком методу. А каузални метод може једино да се бави – створеним.

1Лат.. insulaострво.
2Већ је почела кампања Насељавања Марса, која ће сасвим сигурно следити познату, Холандску шему насељавања Новог Света (верски прогони и сл. производе гомилу избеглица које је лако раселити и при томе им наплатити превоз, а што је основ историјске економије).
3Стохастички или алеаторни – дословно коцкарски.
4Кованица improvisatio дословно значи предвиђање.
5Нечињење – not-doing.